Ann Coulter is a relic, a bigot, a mystery, a firebrand, a slipped disc, a wrenching gear, a fountain that does not trickle but rather vomits apoplectic sarcasm and such impossibly acidic bile that one wonders how such a substance could ever be contained by a creature of — as best as we can tell — the same mere flesh and blood that makes all human beings.

I feel it is important to provide a short gloss of Coulter’s historical attitudes, so those just now learning of her impending visit might have a fair sense of what to expect, in both form and substance, from her lecture.

This woman has made a spectacle by saying “liberals are driven by Satan and lie constantly;” “there should be a literacy test and a poll tax for people who vote;” “all terrorists are Muslims;” “we should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity;” “it would be a much better country if women did not vote;” “news magazines don’t kill people, Muslims do;” and, astonishingly, “I’m not a big fan of the First Amendment.”

True enough, I sometimes feel compelled to allow some negligence of the First Amendment in the cases of such people whom even Bill O’Reilly thinks “do conservatives more harm than good.” But I fear censoring Coulter would do little to assuage this nausea I now feel, knowing since childhood that though monsters might not lurk beneath the bed, the fountainheads of evil do live among us and always shall. And in today’s political climate, Coulter’s voice, though declining in professional dignity and in television ratings, is perhaps still the loudest of the fountainheads.

That is all I wish to say, and all I think I can stomach saying, about the guest we will receive next Tuesday. Nor will I criticize the administrative sultans of Cal Poly, as some already have, for permitting such a person to speak sans any of the suspicious fetters that plagued Michael Pollan some years ago.

Instead, I’d like to question the wisdom of the Cal Poly College Republicans in inviting a famously attention-crazed fascist demagogue to sermonize to our happily unimportant farm town.

Coulter does not work for free, and for a club to muster up the considerable dollars to bring her here — money that one hopes would otherwise have gone to a grandiose barbeque or else some entrepreneurial escapade — is impressive. There is something to be said for attracting visible figures to promote a campus club, but in the case of a group whose constituents are likely only so because membership lends some more breadth to their business administration or agriculture degrees, sponsoring a public damning of women, gays, minorities and the First Amendment seems like a reckless waste of money.

What’s worse is the pertinence of larger-than-life opinionists such as Coulter is rapidly diminishing in today’s populist news arenas. People who exist solely to rock the boat without recompense, people such as Sarah Palin or Coulter, offer vitriol without catharsis. They must continually be at odds with a progressive, liberalizing society in order to keep their hate speech in the shadows of relevance. Their angsty sermons and lectures, aimed at the most impregnable minds, are like sadistic corruptions of pop music: deliciously catchy for now, but alarmingly out of fashion even a short time later.

It worries me that the Cal Poly College Republicans are treating Coulter’s visit more like some kind of messianic deliverance and less like a spicy meatball sandwich to be regretted later.

Brendan Pringle’s articles, when I read them, contain sophomoric and often inane arguments, but they are always carefully written and they hum of research. A similarly careful student organization, it seems to me, would not dare to predicate its reputation and recruitment prospects on simple shock value.

So when this situation gets out of hand, when Coulter’s mouth expels some especially atrocious slur — as it is known to do on her university tours — who will admit to gross irresponsibility during the ensuing demonstrations? I feel compelled to remind that the news generated from 2008’s incident involving hate speech at the Crops House is permanent in the Internet’s memory, and remains highly associated with Cal Poly’s search results.

Those of you who choose to attend Coulter’s lecture will no doubt witness me squirming in my seat throughout the duration, and I will gladly welcome company from liberals and conservatives alike as I ravish a cigarette at the conclusion. But while I know my sensitive stomach will recover after all is said and done, I will have nothing but pity for the Cal Poly College Republicans, whom are all far too young to have bragged about attending an Coulter lecture.

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. Dear Mr. Bloom,

    I am one of the sponsors of the Ann Coulter event, and your article has been brought to my attention. Normally I would not comment on what goes on at Cal Poly, but your article deserves an exception.

    As is common with people who have little in the way of substance to say, you apparently get a kick out of your own flowery verbiage which reads just like what I would expect from an English major. As is so often the case with standard bearers of the liberal cause, you challenge Ms. Coulter’s intellect. Yet I doubt that you have ever read one of her books, and you obviously fail to recognize her academic background.

    In keeping with mainstream media methods, you select quotes out of context, especially failing to recognize that Ms. Coulter makes excellent use of irony and satire. As a major in English and journalism, you should appreciate her use of these tools. But then, it’s hard for liberals to have a sense of humor when they’re so busy saving the world.

    You also demonstrate another typical liberal characteristic by suggesting that the Cal Poly Republicans should instead spend the money they raised for a BBQ or something else you deem more worthwhile. As a sponsor of the event, I’ll be damned if I’ll let you tell me how I should spend my hard earned money. If you want a BBQ, go find your own sponsors or – what a shocking idea – earn the money.

    Your article is in effect nothing more than a venting of your visceral reaction to Ms. Coulter’s appearance. Instead of getting bent out of shape about the event, which I understand you will attend, I suggest that you open your ears and listen to what she has to say. It will certainly be entertaining, and you just might learn something.

    Best regards,
    Christopher Arend

    1. U mad, bro?

      (I’m trying to write in a more wholesome language you can understand.)

      Also I think you’ll find that politics itself is actually little more than people criticizing how other people spend their money.

      See you Tuesday.

    2. Christopher,

      You say “It will certainly be entertaining, and you just might learn something.” It is this that represents the very essence of the problem with Ann Coulter and her comedy routine, which, if we’re honest, we’ll recognize that his entire event is intended only for comedy and entertainment. The issue, for me, is not that you want to spend your money on Ann Coulter, but that you don’t want to spend your money on a serious presentation of contemporary conservative thought, which as a Conservative myself, does not consist entirely of Ann Coulter’s shock statements. This event is frankly embarrassing for someone like me, and you should be embarrassed that you put your money behind it. We’re all better than this farce.

    3. Dear Christopher,

      I suggest you not judge the entire Liberal Arts field by the rantings of one of our colleagues.

      I am sure that you, likewise, would not appreciate over generalizations regarding your major.

      Thank you,

      S.A.J.

    4. Oh god, I just blew my load when I read that letter. Especially when you ended it with “Best regards.”

      You sir know how to write a letter to the Mustang Daily. Keep them coming.

  2. Andrew:
    I appreciated your reference to “our happily unimportant farm town”.

    On the regular, Cal Poly students are not politically reactive. We enjoy our lives enough to enjoy other endeavors that do not involve debating people who’s minds will never be changed.

    That being said, the Cal Poly Republicans sound a little to me like a sexually frustrated group of teenagers. They feel like they are getting ignored (which they are, because we don’t much care). In order to combat this, they bring someone to campus who they KNOW will stir the pot. Because while we might be very luke-warm politically, someone so radical who uses hate speech as a cruch like Coulter is going to bring disent on a campus that does not tolerate that type of hate.

    So Congrats Cal Poly Republicans, you’ve been noticed. Now I, someone who does not limit myself to the views of a political party, now see you in an all new light. As a joke, rather than a serious group.

  3. Thanks for reading, SL!

    I totally hear you about the sexually frustrated teenagers. I can’t even understand who would be a Republican at the age of 19, much less one that actively hangs out with others. I feel bad for them. In a paraphrase of my article’s conclusion: they are all simply too young to already be douchebags.

    I don’t mean that we don’t need conservatism in some respects, but does anyone really *need* the Cal Poly College Republicans?

    Hmmmmm.

  4. Can the Mustang Daily please get a liberal columnist who knows how back up his claims with more than some descriptive language, hyperbole, and imagery?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *